RPI 
W-L: ( 7- 4) PR = 91.0724
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
206 A Kean CLC ( 6- 6, 85.5) 23- 9
214 N Sewanee SAA ( 7- 5, 88.4) 12-11
215 N Rhodes SAA ( 6- 5, 87.6) 18- 7
218 H Cortland SUNYAC ( 5- 5, 92.4) 10-17
221 A Geneseo SUNYAC ( 5- 3, 87.9) 18-13
228 A Muhlenberg Centennial ( 5- 6, 89.1) 15-11
304 A Middlebury NESCAC ( 5- 3, 94.7) 7-16
307 H MIT NEWMAC ( 5- 5, 90.0) 17-10
318 H Williams NESCAC ( 5- 4, 94.1) 11-10
321 A Skidmore Liberty Leagu ( 7- 2, 91.9) 12-16
328 H Union Liberty Leagu ( 2- 9, 92.8) 7-13
401 H Vassar Liberty Leagu ( 5- 4, 88.4)
404 H St Lawrence Liberty Leagu ( 6- 3, 91.8)
411 A Ithaca Liberty Leagu ( 6- 4, 91.2)
415 A Amherst NESCAC ( 3- 4, 95.2)
418 A Clarkson Liberty Leagu ( 7- 2, 90.8)
425 H RIT Liberty Leagu (10- 2, 96.2)
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
206 A Kean 23- 9 14 5 0.00
214 N Sewanee 12-11 1 3 -1.63
215 N Rhodes 18- 7 11 3 1.56
218 H Cortland 10-17 -7 -1 -- -4.00
221 A Geneseo 18-13 5 3 + 2.12
228 A Muhlenberg 15-11 4 2 + 2.31
304 A Middlebury 7-16 -9 -4 -1.04
307 H MIT 17-10 7 1 + 3.61
318 H Williams 11-10 1 -3 + 3.67
321 A Skidmore 12-16 -4 -1 - -2.83
328 H Union 7-13 -6 -1 - -3.61
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
218 H Cortland 10-17 -7 -1 -- -4.00
321 A Skidmore 12-16 -4 -1 - -2.83
328 H Union 7-13 -6 -1 - -3.61
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
221 A Geneseo 18-13 5 3 + 2.12
228 A Muhlenberg 15-11 4 2 + 2.31
307 H MIT 17-10 7 1 + 3.61
318 H Williams 11-10 1 -3 + 3.67
|
RPI Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
| Adrian |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Albertus Magnus |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Albion |
RPI |
|
RPI   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Albright |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Alfred |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Alfred State |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Allegheny |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Alma |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Alvernia |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Amherst |
Amherst |
|
 
| Amherst |
| Anderson (IN) |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Anna Maria |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Arcadia |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Augustana |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Aurora |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Averett |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Babson |
Babson |
|
Babson   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Baldwin Wallace |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Bates |
Bates |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) |
Bates |
| Beloit |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Benedictine (IL) |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Berry |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Bethany |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Bowdoin |
Bowdoin |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) |
Bowdoin |
| Brevard |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Bridgewater |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Brockport |
RPI |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Bryn Athyn |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Cairn |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Calvin |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Canton |
RPI |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Capital |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Carroll |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Carthage |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Castleton |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Catholic |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Centenary (LA) |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Centenary (NJ) |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Centre |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) |
RPI |
| Chatham |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Christopher Newport |
Christopher Newport |
|
 
| Christopher Newport |
| Clark |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Clarkson |
RPI |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
RPI |
| Coast Guard |
RPI |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Cobleskill |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Colby |
RPI |
|
RPI   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Colorado College |
RPI |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
RPI |
| Concordia-Wisconsin |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Connecticut College |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
RPI |
| Cornell College |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Cortland |
Cortland |
Cortland |
 
| |
| Curry |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Dean College |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Delaware Valley |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Delhi |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Denison |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| DePauw |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| DeSales |
RPI |
|
RPI   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Dickinson |
Dickinson |
|
 
| Dickinson |
| Drew |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Dubuque |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Earlham |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Eastern |
RPI |
|
RPI   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Eastern Connecticut |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Edgewood |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Elizabethtown |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Elmhurst |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Elmira |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Emerson |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Emmanuel (MA) |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Endicott |
Endicott |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Endicott |
| Farmingdale State |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| FDU-Florham |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Franciscan |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Franklin & Marshall |
Franklin & Marshall |
|
 
| Franklin & Marshall |
| Geneseo |
RPI |
RPI |
 
| |
| Gettysburg |
Gettysburg |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Gettysburg |
| Gordon |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Goucher |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Greensboro |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Grove City |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Guilford |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Gwynedd Mercy |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Hamilton |
Hamilton |
|
 
| Hamilton |
| Hampden-Sydney |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Hanover |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Hartford |
RPI |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Hartwick |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
RPI |
| Haverford |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Heidelberg |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Hendrix |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Hilbert |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Hiram |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Hood |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Hope |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Huntingdon |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Husson |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Illinois Tech |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Illinois Wesleyan |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Immaculata |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Ithaca |
Ithaca |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Ithaca |
| John Carroll |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Johnson & Wales |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Juniata |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Kalamazoo |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Kean |
RPI |
RPI |
 
| |
| Keene State |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Kenyon |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Keuka |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Kings |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| La Roche |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| LaGrange |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Lake Forest |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Lasell |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Lawrence |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Lebanon Valley |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Lycoming |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Lynchburg |
Lynchburg |
|
 
| Lynchburg |
| Maine Maritime |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Manhattanville |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Marian (WI) |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Marietta |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Maritime |
RPI |
|
RPI   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Mary Washington |
RPI |
|
tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) |
RPI |
| Marymount |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Marywood |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Massachusetts Maritime |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Massachusetts-Boston |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
RPI |
| McDaniel |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| MCLA |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Merchant Marine |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Messiah |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Methodist |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Middlebury |
Middlebury |
Middlebury |
 
| |
| Misericordia |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| MIT |
RPI |
RPI |
 
| |
| Mitchell |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Montclair State |
RPI |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
RPI |
| Moravian |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Morrisville |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Mount St Mary (NY) |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Mount St Vincent |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Mount Union |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| MSOE |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Muhlenberg |
RPI |
RPI |
 
| |
| Muskingum |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Nazareth |
RPI |
|
tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) |
RPI |
| Neumann |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| New England College |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| New Paltz |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Nichols |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| North Central |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Northland |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Norwich |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Oberlin |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Oglethorpe |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Ohio Northern |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Ohio Wesleyan |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Oneonta |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Oswego |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Otterbein |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Penn College |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Pfeiffer |
RPI |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
RPI |
| Piedmont |
RPI |
|
RPI   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Pitt-Bradford |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Plattsburgh |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Plymouth State |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Potsdam |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Purchase |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Randolph |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Randolph-Macon |
Randolph-Macon |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Randolph-Macon |
| Regis (MA) |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Rhodes |
RPI |
RPI |
 
| |
| RIT |
RIT |
|
RIT   3- 0 vs 1- 2 |
|
| Rivier |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Roanoke |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Roger Williams |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Rosemont |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Sage |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Salem State |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Salisbury |
Salisbury |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Salisbury |
| Salve Regina |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Scranton |
RPI |
|
tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) |
RPI |
| Sewanee |
RPI |
RPI |
 
| |
| Shenandoah |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Skidmore |
Skidmore |
Skidmore |
 
| |
| Southern Maine |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Southern Virginia |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Southwestern |
RPI |
|
RPI   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Spalding |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Springfield |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) |
RPI |
| St John Fisher |
St John Fisher |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) |
St John Fisher |
| St Joseph (CT) |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| St Josephs (LI) |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| St Josephs (ME) |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| St Lawrence |
St Lawrence |
|
St Lawrence   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| St Marys (MD) |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| St Vincent |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Stevens |
Stevens |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Stevens |
| Stevenson |
RPI |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
RPI |
| Stockton |
Stockton |
|
 
| Stockton |
| SUNY Poly |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Susquehanna |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Swarthmore |
Swarthmore |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Swarthmore |
| Thiel |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Thomas |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Transylvania |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Trine |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Trinity |
Trinity |
|
Trinity   3- 1 vs 1- 3 |
|
| Tufts |
Tufts |
|
Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| U of New England |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Union |
Union |
Union |
 
| |
| Ursinus |
RPI |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
RPI |
| Utica |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Vassar |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Virginia Wesleyan |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Wabash |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Warren Wilson |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Washington & Jefferson |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Washington & Lee |
Washington & Lee |
|
 
| Washington & Lee |
| Washington College |
Washington College |
|
 
| Washington College |
| Wentworth |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Wesleyan |
Wesleyan |
|
 
| Wesleyan |
| Western Connecticut |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Western New England |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Westminster (PA) |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Wheaton |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Widener |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Wilkes |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| William Peace |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Williams |
RPI |
RPI |
 
| |
| Wilmington (OH) |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| Wittenberg |
RPI |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
RPI |
| Wooster |
RPI |
|
 
| RPI |
| York |
York |
|
 
| York |
PowerWise = 205

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 8.88
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Kean ( 6- 6, 85.5) 23- 9 -14.41 24.84 0.33 0.81 20.32
0 N Sewanee ( 7- 5, 88.4) 12-11 -11.46 27.79 -0.00 0.81 22.43
0 N Rhodes ( 6- 5, 87.6) 18- 7 -12.27 26.98 -0.00 0.81 21.78
0 H Cortland ( 5- 5, 92.4) 10-17 -7.50 31.75 -0.33 0.81 -6.32
0 A Geneseo ( 5- 3, 87.9) 18-13 -12.04 27.21 0.33 0.81 22.23
0 A Muhlenberg ( 5- 6, 89.1) 15-11 -10.85 28.40 0.33 0.81 23.19
0 A Middlebury ( 5- 3, 94.7) 7-16 -5.19 34.05 0.33 0.81 -3.93
0 H MIT ( 5- 5, 90.0) 17-10 -9.88 29.36 -0.33 0.81 23.44
0 H Williams ( 5- 4, 94.1) 11-10 -5.83 33.41 -0.33 0.81 26.71
0 A Skidmore ( 7- 2, 91.9) 12-16 -7.99 31.26 0.33 0.81 -6.18
0 H Union ( 2- 9, 92.8) 7-13 -7.11 32.13 -0.33 0.81 -6.01
------
137.67
|
winning pts = 160.1124 losing points = -22.4399
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------